[PATCH RFC V9 2/19] x86/ticketlock: Don't inline _spin_unlock when using paravirt spinlocks

From: Raghavendra K T
Date: Sat Jun 01 2013 - 15:18:08 EST


x86/ticketlock: Don't inline _spin_unlock when using paravirt spinlocks

From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The code size expands somewhat, and its better to just call
a function rather than inline it.

Thanks Jeremy for original version of ARCH_NOINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK config patch,
which is simplified.

Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 685692c..80fcc4b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -621,6 +621,7 @@ config PARAVIRT_DEBUG
config PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
bool "Paravirtualization layer for spinlocks"
depends on PARAVIRT && SMP
+ select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
---help---
Paravirtualized spinlocks allow a pvops backend to replace the
spinlock implementation with something virtualization-friendly

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/