Re: Exotic architecture fixes

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Tue Jun 04 2013 - 03:15:04 EST

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 21:39:38 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> > <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> I created a branch where I collected several exotic architecture fixes
>> >> (and a few
>> >> other trivial fixes):
>> >>
>> >> git:// exotic-arch-fixes
>> >>
>> >> Several of these have been ack'ed (cfr. *-indicators below).
>> >> If you reject any of the commits, please scream.
>> >> If you want to take any of them yourself, please do so.
>> >>
>> >> I intend to merge this into my for-next branch after the release of v3.10-rc4,
>> >> and ask Linus to pull after the release of v3.10-rc5.
>> I merged this in the for-next branch of my repo.
> Surely, your for-linus branch would have been a better choice. And then
> maybe merge that into your for-next branch if you really needed these
> fixes to continue with m68k work?

An updated version is now in for-linus, as Linus has pulled the m68k
content on the
old for-linus branch.



Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at