[PATCH 20/70] cifs: only set ops for inodes in I_NEW state

From: Luis Henriques
Date: Tue Jun 04 2013 - 10:20:59 EST


3.5.7.14 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit c2b93e0699723700f886ce17bb65ffd771195a6d upstream.

It's generally not safe to reset the inode ops once they've been set. In
the case where the inode was originally thought to be a directory and
then later found to be a DFS referral, this can lead to an oops when we
try to trigger an inode op on it after changing the ops to the blank
referral operations.

Reported-and-Tested-by: Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/cifs/inode.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/cifs/inode.c b/fs/cifs/inode.c
index 745da3d..6fbfbdb 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/inode.c
@@ -173,7 +173,8 @@ cifs_fattr_to_inode(struct inode *inode, struct cifs_fattr *fattr)

if (fattr->cf_flags & CIFS_FATTR_DFS_REFERRAL)
inode->i_flags |= S_AUTOMOUNT;
- cifs_set_ops(inode);
+ if (inode->i_state & I_NEW)
+ cifs_set_ops(inode);
}

void
--
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/