On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 12:04:26PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:On 20/04/2013 00:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman :On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:51:23AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:On 04/17/2013 10:39 AM, Fabio Porcedda :On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:These patches clean up at91_cf a bit and add DT bindings.
It is based on a previous series from Joachim Eastwood and other cleanup
patches by Fabio and Laurent.
I have collected them together as they are lying around for some time.
Please tell me if It can go through PCMCIA tree or if Andrew or Greg can
Note that they are not bug fixes, so you can stack them for 3.10.
Thanks for your help, best regards.
v2: add 2 more cleanup patches:
- move to module_platform_driver_probe()
- little trivial indentation fix
Fabio Porcedda (1):
pcmcia: at91_cf: use module_platform_driver_probe()
Joachim Eastwood (5):
pcmcia: at91_cf: fix gpio_get_value in at91_cf_get_status
pcmcia: at91_cf: convert to dev_ print functions
pcmcia: at91_cf: use devm_ functions for allocations
pcmcia: at91_cf: clean up header includes
pcmcia: at91_cf: add support for DT
Laurent Navet (1):
pcmcia/trivial: at91_cf: fix checkpatch error
.../devicetree/bindings/ata/atmel-at91_cf.txt | 19 +++
drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig | 2 +-
drivers/pcmcia/at91_cf.c | 176 ++++++++++-----------
3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/atmel-at91_cf.txt
Andrew, Greg, can you please take this series?
Here is the post on lkml:
Here is the first patch in patchwork (1/7):
Tell me if I can do something else to make this applied upstream...
The PCMCIA maintainer should take these, not me.
I know Greg, but this patch series is still not taken by anyone 3
months after its first submission and after several requests by both
Fabio and myself...
The series is still applying on linux-next today... Maybe it can go
via Andrew, then...
I can take them through my char/misc driver tree if it's been that long
of a delay, care to resend them to me?