Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add basic SecureOS support

From: Alex Courbot
Date: Thu Jun 06 2013 - 06:38:07 EST


Hi Tomasz,

On 06/06/2013 07:17 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
+Global properties
+-------------------------------------------
+
+The following properties can be specified into the "chosen" root
+node:
+
+ nvidia,secure-os: enable SecureOS.

Hmm, on Exynos we had something like

firmware@0203F000 {
compatible = "samsung,secure-firmware";
reg = <0x0203F000 0x1000>;
};

but your solution might be actually the proper one, since firmware is not
a hardware block. (The address in reg property is pointing to SYSRAM
memory, which is an additional communication channel with the firmware.)

Yes, I saw your implementation but decided to do it through the chosen node anyway, since that's what it seems to be designed and we don't need any reg parameter.

I think this patch could be split into several patches:
- add support for firmware
- split reset function
- add reset support using firmware.

Mmm possibly yes, but I wonder if that would not be too much splitting. Stephen?

Hmm, I wonder if you need all this complexity here. Have a look at our
exynos_smc function

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos-smc.S?id=refs/tags/next-20130606

Yes, I just embarrassed myself showing my ignorance of ARM assembler. ;) The fix Russel proposed is pretty close to your version.

+static const struct firmware_ops tegra_firmware_ops = {
+ .set_cpu_boot_addr = tegra_set_cpu_boot_addr,
+};

It's good that this interface is finally getting some user besides Exynos.

I didn't know about it first but Joseph kindly pointed it out to me and it indeed makes it easier to implement this.

Thanks,
Alex.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/