Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86, efi: Add an efi= kernel command line parameter
From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Thu Jun 06 2013 - 15:41:55 EST
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:35:48PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> No, I think that's the wrong thing to do. We should set up the current
> mappings and the 1:1 mappings, and pass the current mappings through
> SetVirtualAddressMap(). That matches the behaviour of Windows.
And when do we use the 1:1 mappings and when the current mappings when
doing runtime calls?
Also, would the 1:1 mappings even work if not passed through
SetVirtualAddressMap? I'm sensing a "yes" but I don't know...
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/