On Monday 17 of June 2013 15:10:47 Oliver Schinagl wrote:<snip>On 17-06-13 14:51, Tomasz Figa wrote:On Monday 17 of June 2013 12:36:47 Oliver Schinagl wrote:On 15-06-13 12:28, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Oh wow, very good catch. I had to dig a little into the source where itNow we pass this array to add_randomness(array, 16). So add_randomness
sees 16 ints in an array. So while there will be a lot of extra zero's,
there still be 16 elements copied/processed, no?
The second argument of add_randomness is number of bytes, not number of
elements in array, as far as I can tell.