Re: RE : [GIT PULL] at91: Device Tree update for 3.11 #2
From: Olof Johansson
Date: Mon Jun 17 2013 - 12:56:25 EST
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Ferre, Nicolas <Nicolas.FERRE@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:47:47AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>>> Arnd, Olof,
>>> Additional pull-request for AT91 DT patches.
>>> It contains the remaining part of the USB gadget pull-request that I sent you
>>> last week. After having split it, here is the DT part.
>>> It also contains the update of DMA bindings: it is the AT91 part the should go
>>> through arm-soc. I have included the patch (ARM: at91: dt: add header to define
>>> at_hdmac configuration) so that we avoid build errors whichever git tree
>>> (slave-dma or arm-soc) is merged first.
>>> A SPI DT patch for at91sam9x5 is also added.
>>> Thanks, best regards,
>>> The following changes since commit 028633c238f91dc113520a7ad25d37b2ba9068af:
>>> ARM: at91/dt: add pinctrl definition for at91 tc blocks (2013-05-31 22:40:37 +0200)
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>> git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-dt
> I do not see it appearing in arm-soc/at91/dt branch even though is it present in arm-soc/for-next: is it normal?
I had missed to push that (and the driver branch) up. They are there
now, as at91/dt2 and at91/drivers. Fixed the bad branch name in
arm-soc-for-next-contents.txt as well.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/