Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core
From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Thu Jun 20 2013 - 01:05:46 EST
On 18 June 2013 19:14, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:26:16 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:12:13 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> > On 17 June 2013 19:21, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Well, that's why on x86 turbo is controlled by hardware that takes
>> care of keeping things within the chip's thermal limits.
> And this is the reason why I don't want to overly change acpi-cpufreq.c
> code. :-)
We need to keep both hardware/software boost features at the same place
in core, they may behave differently though. That's why I wanted you
to do that.
> I think that thermal subsystem shall be the second option to disable SW
> The main control shall be done inside the cpufreq core. The idea to
> disable boost when more than one core is active is rational.
But then, it might not be enough. A single core can make your SoC
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/