[PATCH 4/5] mm/rmap: share the i_mmap_rwsem

From: Davidlohr Bueso
Date: Mon Jun 24 2013 - 20:22:39 EST


Similar to commit 4fc3f1d6, which optimized the anon-vma rwsem, we can share
the i_mmap_rwsem among multiple readers for rmap_walk_file(),
try_to_unmap_file() and collect_procs_file().

With this change, and the rwsem optimizations discussed in
http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/16/38 we can see performance improvements.
On a 8 socket, 80 core DL980, when compared to a vanilla 3.10-rc5, aim7
benefits in throughput, with the following workloads (beyond 500 users):

- alltests (+14.5%)
- custom (+17%)
- disk (+11%)
- high_systime (+5%)
- shared (+15%)
- short (+4%)

For lower amounts of users, there are no significant differences as all numbers
are within the 0-2% noise range.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@xxxxxx>
---
include/linux/fs.h | 10 ++++++++++
mm/memory-failure.c | 7 +++----
mm/rmap.c | 12 ++++++------
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 79b8548..5646641 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -485,6 +485,16 @@ static inline void i_mmap_unlock_write(struct address_space *mapping)
up_write(&mapping->i_mmap_rwsem);
}

+static inline void i_mmap_lock_read(struct address_space *mapping)
+{
+ down_read(&mapping->i_mmap_rwsem);
+}
+
+static inline void i_mmap_unlock_read(struct address_space *mapping)
+{
+ up_read(&mapping->i_mmap_rwsem);
+}
+
/*
* Might pages of this file be mapped into userspace?
*/
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index e7e0f90..6db44eb 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ static void collect_procs_file(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
struct task_struct *tsk;
struct address_space *mapping = page->mapping;

- i_mmap_lock_write(mapping);
+ i_mmap_lock_read(mapping);
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
for_each_process(tsk) {
pgoff_t pgoff = page->index << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT);
@@ -444,8 +444,7 @@ static void collect_procs_file(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
if (!task_early_kill(tsk))
continue;

- vma_interval_tree_foreach(vma, &mapping->i_mmap, pgoff,
- pgoff) {
+ vma_interval_tree_foreach(vma, &mapping->i_mmap, pgoff, pgoff) {
/*
* Send early kill signal to tasks where a vma covers
* the page but the corrupted page is not necessarily
@@ -458,7 +457,7 @@ static void collect_procs_file(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
}
}
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
- i_mmap_unlock_write(mapping);
+ i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);
}

/*
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index bc8eeb5..98b986d 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -808,7 +808,7 @@ static int page_referenced_file(struct page *page,
*/
BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));

- i_mmap_lock_write(mapping);
+ i_mmap_lock_read(mapping);

/*
* i_mmap_mutex does not stabilize mapcount at all, but mapcount
@@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ static int page_referenced_file(struct page *page,
break;
}

- i_mmap_unlock_write(mapping);
+ i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);
return referenced;
}

@@ -1516,7 +1516,7 @@ static int try_to_unmap_file(struct page *page, enum ttu_flags flags)
if (PageHuge(page))
pgoff = page->index << compound_order(page);

- i_mmap_lock_write(mapping);
+ i_mmap_lock_read(mapping);
vma_interval_tree_foreach(vma, &mapping->i_mmap, pgoff, pgoff) {
unsigned long address = vma_address(page, vma);
ret = try_to_unmap_one(page, vma, address, flags);
@@ -1594,7 +1594,7 @@ static int try_to_unmap_file(struct page *page, enum ttu_flags flags)
list_for_each_entry(vma, &mapping->i_mmap_nonlinear, shared.nonlinear)
vma->vm_private_data = NULL;
out:
- i_mmap_unlock_write(mapping);
+ i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);
return ret;
}

@@ -1711,7 +1711,7 @@ static int rmap_walk_file(struct page *page, int (*rmap_one)(struct page *,

if (!mapping)
return ret;
- i_mmap_lock_write(mapping);
+ i_mmap_lock_read(mapping);
vma_interval_tree_foreach(vma, &mapping->i_mmap, pgoff, pgoff) {
unsigned long address = vma_address(page, vma);
ret = rmap_one(page, vma, address, arg);
@@ -1723,7 +1723,7 @@ static int rmap_walk_file(struct page *page, int (*rmap_one)(struct page *,
* never contain migration ptes. Decide what to do about this
* limitation to linear when we need rmap_walk() on nonlinear.
*/
- i_mmap_unlock_write(mapping);
+ i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);
return ret;
}

--
1.7.11.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/