Re: kvm_intel: Could not allocate 42 bytes percpu data

From: Rusty Russell
Date: Mon Jul 01 2013 - 04:53:53 EST


Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@xxxxxx> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Lots (~700+) of the following messages are showing up in the dmesg of a
> 3.10-rc1 based kernel (Host OS is running on a large socket count box
> with HT-on).
>
> [ 82.270682] PERCPU: allocation failed, size=42 align=16, alloc from
> reserved chunk failed
> [ 82.272633] kvm_intel: Could not allocate 42 bytes percpu data

Woah, weird....

Oh. Shit. Um, this is embarrassing.

Thanks,
Rusty.
===
module: do percpu allocation after uniqueness check. No, really!

v3.8-rc1-5-g1fb9341 was supposed to stop parallel kvm loads exhausting
percpu memory on large machines:

Now we have a new state MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED, we can insert the
module into the list (and thus guarantee its uniqueness) before we
allocate the per-cpu region.

In my defence, it didn't actually say the patch did this. Just that
we "can".

This patch actually *does* it.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Noone it seems.

diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index cab4bce..fa53db8 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -2927,7 +2927,6 @@ static struct module *layout_and_allocate(struct load_info *info, int flags)
{
/* Module within temporary copy. */
struct module *mod;
- Elf_Shdr *pcpusec;
int err;

mod = setup_load_info(info, flags);
@@ -2942,17 +2941,10 @@ static struct module *layout_and_allocate(struct load_info *info, int flags)
err = module_frob_arch_sections(info->hdr, info->sechdrs,
info->secstrings, mod);
if (err < 0)
- goto out;
+ return ERR_PTR(err);

- pcpusec = &info->sechdrs[info->index.pcpu];
- if (pcpusec->sh_size) {
- /* We have a special allocation for this section. */
- err = percpu_modalloc(mod,
- pcpusec->sh_size, pcpusec->sh_addralign);
- if (err)
- goto out;
- pcpusec->sh_flags &= ~(unsigned long)SHF_ALLOC;
- }
+ /* We will do a special allocation for per-cpu sections later. */
+ info->sechdrs[info->index.pcpu].sh_flags &= ~(unsigned long)SHF_ALLOC;

/* Determine total sizes, and put offsets in sh_entsize. For now
this is done generically; there doesn't appear to be any
@@ -2963,17 +2955,22 @@ static struct module *layout_and_allocate(struct load_info *info, int flags)
/* Allocate and move to the final place */
err = move_module(mod, info);
if (err)
- goto free_percpu;
+ return ERR_PTR(err);

/* Module has been copied to its final place now: return it. */
mod = (void *)info->sechdrs[info->index.mod].sh_addr;
kmemleak_load_module(mod, info);
return mod;
+}

-free_percpu:
- percpu_modfree(mod);
-out:
- return ERR_PTR(err);
+static int alloc_module_percpu(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info)
+{
+ Elf_Shdr *pcpusec = &info->sechdrs[info->index.pcpu];
+ if (!pcpusec->sh_size)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* We have a special allocation for this section. */
+ return percpu_modalloc(mod, pcpusec->sh_size, pcpusec->sh_addralign);
}

/* mod is no longer valid after this! */
@@ -3237,6 +3234,11 @@ static int load_module(struct load_info *info, const char __user *uargs,
}
#endif

+ /* To avoid stressing percpu allocator, do this once we're unique. */
+ err = alloc_module_percpu(mod, info);
+ if (err)
+ goto unlink_mod;
+
/* Now module is in final location, initialize linked lists, etc. */
err = module_unload_init(mod);
if (err)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/