Re: [PATCH 0/9] mm, hugetlb: clean-up and possible bug fix

[Sam Ben]

On 07/16/2013 09:10 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 07:40:16PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > > First 5 patches are almost trivial clean-up patches.
> > >
> > > The others are for fixing three bugs.
> > > Perhaps, these problems are minor, because this codes are used
> > > for a long time, and there is no bug reporting for these problems.
> > >
> > > These patches are based on v3.10.0 and
> > > passed sanity check of libhugetlbfs.
> > does that mean you had run with libhugetlbfs test suite ?
> Yes! I can't find any reggression on libhugetlbfs test suite.

Where can get your test case?

> >   
> > -aneesh
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/