Re: [RFC 0/4] Transparent on-demand struct page initializationembedded in the buddy allocator

From: Joonsoo Kim
Date: Tue Jul 16 2013 - 04:55:10 EST


On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:27:56AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Robin Holt <holt@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > [...]
> >
> > With this patch, we did boot a 16TiB machine. Without the patches, the
> > v3.10 kernel with the same configuration took 407 seconds for
> > free_all_bootmem. With the patches and operating on 2MiB pages instead
> > of 1GiB, it took 26 seconds so performance was improved. I have no feel
> > for how the 1GiB chunk size will perform.
>
> That's pretty impressive.
>
> It's still a 15x speedup instead of a 512x speedup, so I'd say there's
> something else being the current bottleneck, besides page init
> granularity.
>
> Can you boot with just a few gigs of RAM and stuff the rest into hotplug
> memory, and then hot-add that memory? That would allow easy profiling of
> remaining overhead.
>
> Side note:
>
> Robert Richter and Boris Petkov are working on 'persistent events' support
> for perf, which will eventually allow boot time profiling - I'm not sure
> if the patches and the tooling support is ready enough yet for your
> purposes.
>
> Robert, Boris, the following workflow would be pretty intuitive:
>
> - kernel developer sets boot flag: perf=boot,freq=1khz,size=16MB
>
> - we'd get a single (cycles?) event running once the perf subsystem is up
> and running, with a sampling frequency of 1 KHz, sending profiling
> trace events to a sufficiently sized profiling buffer of 16 MB per
> CPU.
>
> - once the system reaches SYSTEM_RUNNING, profiling is stopped either
> automatically - or the user stops it via a new tooling command.
>
> - the profiling buffer is extracted into a regular perf.data via a
> special 'perf record' call or some other, new perf tooling
> solution/variant.
>
> [ Alternatively the kernel could attempt to construct a 'virtual'
> perf.data from the persistent buffer, available via /sys/debug or
> elsewhere in /sys - just like the kernel constructs a 'virtual'
> /proc/kcore, etc. That file could be copied or used directly. ]

Hello, Robert, Boris, Ingo.

How about executing a perf in usermodehelper and collecting output in
tmpfs? Using this approach, we can start a perf after rootfs
initialization, because we need a perf binary at least. But we can use
almost functionality of perf. If anyone have interest with
this approach, I will send patches implementing this idea.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/