Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core

[Viresh Kumar]

On 17 July 2013 17:01, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> First off, I'm not sure how many applications actually use it and I think,
> if any, they should be able cope with the attribute not being present.
>
> Of course, if it turns out that yes, there are applications using it and no,
> they cannot cope with the missing attribute, we'll need to address this.
> That said such applications wouldn't work with earlier kernels in which that
> attribute wasn't present at all, so I suppose this is really unlikely.
>
> So, do whichever makes more sense to you: Design things to preserve the old
> behavior (which is sightly confusing) or design them to expose the attribute
> if the feature is actually supported and be prepared to address the (unlikely)
> case when some hypothetical applications break because of that.

Okay. Its better to keep it the way Lukasz designed it in his last patchset.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/