Re: [PATCH] arm64: use common reboot infrastructure

From: Catalin Marinas
Date: Wed Jul 17 2013 - 15:20:34 EST


On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:13:00PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Commit 7b6d864b48d9 (reboot: arm: change reboot_mode to use enum
> reboot_mode) changed the way reboot is handled on arm, which has a
> direct impact on arm64 as we share the reset driver on the VE platform.
>
> The obvious fix is to move arm64 to use the same infrastructure.
>
> Cc: Robin Holt <holt@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>

I just did the same before I saw your patch. Anyway, I'll take yours as
you did it first ;)

> --- a/kernel/reboot.c
> +++ b/kernel/reboot.c
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ int C_A_D = 1;
> struct pid *cad_pid;
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(cad_pid);
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_ARM) || defined(CONFIG_UNICORE32)
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64) || defined(CONFIG_UNICORE32)
> #define DEFAULT_REBOOT_MODE = REBOOT_HARD
> #else
> #define DEFAULT_REBOOT_MODE

Do we need this or we could use the default (I think REBOOT_COLD is 0)?

--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/