Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes for 3.11-rc2

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Sat Jul 20 2013 - 09:26:28 EST


On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 08:25:04AM -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
> It's marginal with only two call sites, but would it be worth factoring
> out the write-back function? Something like this (untested) patch.
> It definitely makes the generated assembly cleaner.

I don't think that matters because this is called only once on suspend.
Unless the cleaner assembly translates into a palpable speedup, which I
doubt.

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/