Re: [PATCH v3 12/16] cpufreq: kirkwood-cpufreq: remove device treeparsing for cpu nodes

[Andrew Lunn]

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:32:23PM +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Now that the cpu device registration initialises the of_node(if available)
> appropriately for all the cpus, parsing here is redundant.
> 
> This patch removes all DT parsing and uses cpu->of_node instead.
> 
> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
> index c233ea6..25ac2cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
>  #include <linux/clk.h>
>  #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>  #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> -#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <asm/proc-fns.h>
> @@ -175,9 +175,11 @@ static int kirkwood_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (IS_ERR(priv.base))
>  		return PTR_ERR(priv.base);
>  
> -	np = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus/cpu@0");
> -	if (!np)
> +	np = of_cpu_device_node_get(0);
> +	if (!np) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get cpu device node\n");
>  		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
>  
>  	priv.cpu_clk = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "cpu_clk");
>  	if (IS_ERR(priv.cpu_clk)) {
> -- 
> 1.8.1.2

Hi Sudeep

I've not had chance to test it, but it looks O.K.

Acked-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>

	  Andrew

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/