Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] clk: implement remuxing during set_rate

[Stephen Boyd]

On 06/21, James Hogan wrote:
> On 21 June 2013 18:04, Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Quoting James Hogan (2013-06-13 09:05:57)
> >> This patchset adds support for automatic selection of the best parent
> >> for a clock mux, i.e. the one which can provide the closest clock rate
> >> to that requested. It can be disabled by a new CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT
> >> flag (which is set for all uses of clk_register_mux().
> >>
> >> This works by way of adding a new op, determine_rate, similar to
> >> round_rate but with an extra parameter to allow the clock driver to
> >> optionally select a different parent clock. This is used in
> >> clk_calc_new_rates to decide whether to initiate a set_parent operation.
> >
> > Hi James,
> >
> > I'm going to hold off on this one for 3.11. I'll revisit it after the
> > next merge window.
> 
> Okay, no worries.
> 

Has a new patchset been sent out? I'd like to see this merge in
3.12.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/