Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools, perf: Add a precise event qualifier v2
From: Vince Weaver
Date: Wed Jul 24 2013 - 14:53:59 EST
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013, Sasha Levin wrote:
> It's probably fine to change a testing ABI once in a while, but when things
> like trinity start breaking that often due to ABI changes in the same exact
> place, that's too much IMO.
The problem is they want the ABI to be "whatever our closely-coupled
userspace perf tool accepts as input" which is an often-changing
complicated (and undocumented) set of LEX and YACC parsers.
I guess we could just give in and declare that to be the official
perf sysfs interface in the ABI documentation.
It's frustrating trying to maintain tools that use the perf_event
interface because the inclusion of perf in the kernel is used as an excuse
to constantly break the ABI.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/