Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Add support for pinned modifier
From: Michael Ellerman
Date: Thu Jul 25 2013 - 08:53:36 EST
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 13:04 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:26:42PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > I would have used "p" obviously, but that's taken. Are folks happy that
> > "P" is sufficiently different from "p"? I couldn't think of anything
> > better.
> I've seen proposals where 'P' is used for the max 'p' level :/
So 'p' is for precise, which maps onto a 2 bit field in
No 'p' modifier means precise_ip = 0, so the max value of 3 would be
We don't use 'p' so I have no idea how often it's used and whether
typing 'ppp' is going to be a major pain for people.
> But yes, vexing situation.
Quite. Nothing jumps out as an obvious alternative, including any of the
So how about 'D'.
Because it makes a smiley face:
$ perf stat -e cycles:D
And having perf smile at you can't be a bad thing.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/