Re: RFC: device thermal limits represented in device tree nodes

[Pawel Moll]

On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 17:15 +0100, Pawel Moll wrote:
> > Another way, as I mentioned in the original RFC, an option would be to
> > have the thermal_zone node not embedded in any device node. But them, we
> > would need to firmly link it to other device nodes, to describe what is
> > monitored and what is used for monitoring. 
> 
> You mean the zone nodes would live at the top level of the tree? To my
> mind the root represents the device (the board, whatever you call it),

What I wanted to say was: ... so the zone would still be embedded in a
device node :-)

Pawel


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/