Re: RFC: device thermal limits represented in device tree nodes
From: Eduardo Valentin
Date: Thu Jul 25 2013 - 13:22:56 EST
On 25-07-2013 12:38, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 17:15 +0100, Pawel Moll wrote:
>>> Another way, as I mentioned in the original RFC, an option would be to
>>> have the thermal_zone node not embedded in any device node. But them, we
>>> would need to firmly link it to other device nodes, to describe what is
>>> monitored and what is used for monitoring.
>> You mean the zone nodes would live at the top level of the tree? To my
>> mind the root represents the device (the board, whatever you call it),
> What I wanted to say was: ... so the zone would still be embedded in a
> device node :-)
ahh ok.. I see.
You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)
Description: OpenPGP digital signature