Re: RFC: device thermal limits represented in device tree nodes

[Eduardo Valentin]

On 25-07-2013 12:38, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 17:15 +0100, Pawel Moll wrote:
>>> Another way, as I mentioned in the original RFC, an option would be to
>>> have the thermal_zone node not embedded in any device node. But them, we
>>> would need to firmly link it to other device nodes, to describe what is
>>> monitored and what is used for monitoring. 
>>
>> You mean the zone nodes would live at the top level of the tree? To my
>> mind the root represents the device (the board, whatever you call it),
> 
> What I wanted to say was: ... so the zone would still be embedded in a
> device node :-)
>

ahh ok.. I see.


> Pawel
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)

Eduardo Valentin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature