Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] ext4: Transparent Decompression Support
From: JÃrn Engel
Date: Thu Jul 25 2013 - 16:18:54 EST
On Thu, 25 July 2013 13:09:39 -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
> > > What about introducing a new flag, O_COMPR which tells the
> > > kernel, btw, we want this file to be decompressed if it can be. It
> > > can fallback to O_RDONLY or something like that? That gets rid of
> > > the chattr ugliness.
> > How is that different from chattr ugliness, which also comes down to a
> > single flag? ;)
> It's much worse because it's per fd instead of per inode.
> The page cache, where the undisclosed complexity of this proposal lurks,
> where compressed and uncompressed cached copies of the data need to be
> managed somehow, is per inode.
You've been giving it away! Bad Zach, no cookies tonight.
With a PC, I always felt limited by the software available. On Unix,
I am limited only by my knowledge.
-- Peter J. Schoenster
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/