Re: [PATCH, re-send] Always trap on BUG()

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thu Jul 25 2013 - 18:05:19 EST

* Chen Gang <gang.chen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 07/23/2013 05:36 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > (the crazies can keep a separate patch to remove even more of BUG() to win
> > a K or two.)
> >
> Excuse me, my English is not quite well, I do not quite understand your
> meaning, could you please repeat again in details or say more clearly ?

I meant: those people who'd like to have the tiny
additional space savings offered by !CONFIG_BUG (and are
crazy enough to live with non-determinism in exchange for a
measly payment of 1 KB), can apply a separate, out of tree
patch just fine and don't need upstream kernel support.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at