Re: [PATCH, re-send] Always trap on BUG()

From: Chen Gang
Date: Thu Jul 25 2013 - 21:06:44 EST

On 07/26/2013 06:05 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Chen Gang <gang.chen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 07/23/2013 05:36 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> (the crazies can keep a separate patch to remove even more of BUG() to win
>>> a K or two.)
>> Excuse me, my English is not quite well, I do not quite understand your
>> meaning, could you please repeat again in details or say more clearly ?
> I meant: those people who'd like to have the tiny
> additional space savings offered by !CONFIG_BUG (and are
> crazy enough to live with non-determinism in exchange for a
> measly payment of 1 KB), can apply a separate, out of tree
> patch just fine and don't need upstream kernel support.

Thank you for your reply in details.

Chen Gang
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at