Re: DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in devicetree janitoring / cleanup?]

[Richard Cochran]

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 03:37:53PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> 
> We use DT has a kernel configuration input. Our environment is
> designed to guarantee 100% that the kernel and DT match exactly. DT
> very deliberately isn't an ABI boundary in our systems.

Think about what you just said.

The DT describes the *hardware* not the kernel. Why should you ever
need to update your DT at all?

(Hint: the answer is, because the DT system is broken.)

Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/