Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/3] Teach perf_trace_##call() to checkhlist_empty(perf_events)
From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Fri Jul 26 2013 - 11:25:57 EST
On 07/20, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 07/19, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 09:43 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > Peter, Steve, any objections?
> > >
> > Yep, agreed.
> > The whole series...
> > Reviewed-and-Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> But, to avoid the confusion, please do not forget that this series
> textually depends on cd92bf61 "Move the PERF_MAX_TRACE_SIZE check
> into perf_trace_buf_prepare()" in your tree. So this should be
> routed via rostedt/linux-trace as well.
Update. cd92bf61 is already in Linus's tree.
So, Ingo, if you were going to take these patches - please ;)
It seems that everybody agree with this hack. Please tell me
if I should resend this series once again or make a small branch
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/