Re: RFC: revert request for cpuidle patches e11538d1 and 69a37bea

From: Rik van Riel
Date: Fri Jul 26 2013 - 14:29:53 EST

On 07/26/2013 02:27 PM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On 7/26/2013 11:13 AM, Rik van Riel wrote:

Could you try running the tests with just the repeat mode
stuff from commit 69a37bea excluded, but leaving the common
infrastructure and commit e11538?

personally I think we should go the other way around.
revert the set entirely first, and now, and get our performance back
to what it should be

and then see what we can add back without causing the regressions.
this may take longer, or be done in steps, and that's ok.

the end point may well be the same... but we can then evaluate in the right

Works for me. I have no objection to reverting both patches,
if the people planning to fix the code prefer that :)

All rights reversed
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at