Re: DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in devicetree janitoring / cleanup?]

[Richard Cochran]

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:15:24AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 06:54:33AM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > I too work on commercial embedded systems, and DT has proven to be
> > one gigantic *PITA*.
> 
> Why do you think our experiences are so different?

Here are a few recent examples:

* What happens when one wants to boot vanilla kernel on the beaglebone?

  http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg198431.html

* Wanting already merged code to work is too much to ask.

  http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg79731.html

* When people try in good faith to conduct methodical boot tests,
  DT is working against them.

  http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg79960.html

Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/