Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we havepeople interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?]

From: Arend van Spriel
Date: Mon Jul 29 2013 - 06:16:26 EST

On 07/29/2013 11:19 AM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 07/27/2013 10:01 PM, jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Grant Likely
<grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Arend van Spriel
<arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Let's see how many people go and scream if I say this: Too bad .dts
are not done using XML format as DT bindings could be described
using XML

Draft an example and show us how it would look! :-) There is
absolutely nothing preventing us from expressing a DT in XML format,
or even using XSLT to define DT schema while still using our current
.dts syntax. It would be trivial to do lossless translation between
.dts syntax and xml.

The problem that I have with XML and XSLT is that it is very verbose
and not entirely friendly to mere-mortals. However, I'm more than
willing to be proved wrong on this point.

I considered this approach a while ago and discarded it. It would work
but it is just too much of a Frankenstein monster.

Ah, but he is so cute. At least I do not think it is more monstrous as
the bindings files. I just browsed through a couple of arm binding files
as I felt challenged to come up with an example. I did not get the
impression that there is some kind of template in place to get consitent
bindings descriptions.

Much cleaner to modify dtc to take a schema as part of the compilation
process. The schema language itself has no requirement to look like
DTS syntax. Whoever wrote dtc probably has a favorite language that
would be good for writing schemas in.

Not sure if I can follow here. I guess you mean the dts compilation,
right? There are tools freely available to validate XML files against
XSD specification files. As an example libxml2 has support for it. I
suspect it is not desired to have a dependency for DTC with an
out-of-tree library, but it could be incorporated and have DTC spew the
validation results.

crap. Probably not as libxml2 has MIT-license.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at