Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI / PM: Make messages in acpi_device_set_power() print device names

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Mon Jul 29 2013 - 08:01:03 EST


On Monday, July 29, 2013 11:06:36 AM Lan Tianyu wrote:
> 2013/7/27 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Modify acpi_device_set_power() so that diagnostic messages printed by
> > it to the kernel log always contain the name of the device concerned
> > to make it possible to identify the device that triggered the message
> > if need be.
> >
> > Also replace printk(KERN_WARNING ) with dev_warn() everywhere in that
> > function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/device_pm.c | 22 ++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> > +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> > @@ -166,20 +166,20 @@ int acpi_device_set_power(struct acpi_de
> > /* Make sure this is a valid target state */
> >
> > if (state == device->power.state) {
> > - ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Device is already at %s\n",
> > + ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Device [%s] already in %s\n",
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
> Missing "is" or it should be omitted?

The "is" is not necessary here (in my opinion).

Kind of in analogy with "This has been done already" and "Already done".

Thanks,
Rafael


--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/