Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Remove extra variables

[Viresh Kumar]

On 30 July 2013 19:28, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 07:06:33 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> We call cpufreq_cpu_get() in cpufreq_add_dev_symlink() to increase usage
>> refcount of policy and not to get policy for a cpu. So, we don't really need to
>> capture the return value of this routine and call put for it later for failure
>> cases. We can simply use policy passed as an argument to this routine.
>>
>> Moreover debug print is rewritten to make it more clear.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Both [1-2/2] look good, but what do they apply to?  Mainline, linux-next,
> my bleeding-edge branch?

Sorry for not mentioning this, bleeding-edge :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/