Re: [PATCH 2/3] fs/binfmts: Better handling of binfmt loops
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue Jul 30 2013 - 17:04:56 EST
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 08:40:44 -0700 Zach Levis <zml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> With these changes, when a binfmt loop is encountered,
> the ELOOP will propogate back to the 0 depth. At this point the
> argv and argc values will be reset to what they were originally and an
> attempt is made to continue with the following binfmt handlers.
hm, why? What problem does this fix? What value does the change offer
to our users?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/