Re: [QUERY] lguest64
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Wed Jul 31 2013 - 09:49:47 EST
On 07/31/2013 06:17 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> The big problem with pvops is that they are a permanent tax on future
>> development -- a classic case of "the hooks problem." As such it is
>> important that there be a real, significant, use case with enough users
>> to make the pain worthwhile. With Xen looking at sunsetting PV support
>> with a long horizon, it might currently be possible to remove pvops some
> PV MMU parts specifically.
Pretty much stuff that is driverized on plain hardware doesn't matter.
What are you looking at with respect to the basic CPU control state?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/