Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: add generic pins and functions properties

[Stephen Warren]

On 08/06/2013 02:41 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:56:00PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> pinctrl bindings can benefit from generic property names that define
>> which pins a "pin configuration node" affects, and which mux function
>> to select onto those pins. Document new properties for this purpose so
>> that other bindings may refer to them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt | 3 +++
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt
>> index 31b0cb9..237823a 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt
>> @@ -138,6 +138,9 @@ structure of the DT nodes that contain these properties.
>>  
>>  Supported generic properties are:
>>  
>> +pins			- the list of pins that properties in the node
>> +			  apply to
>> +function		- the mux function to select
> 
> I assume the type of these properties must be described in the more
> specific binding?

Yes, I think so. I guess I should also add entries into the section
right below this list which describes the values for each of the
properties that has values.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/