Re: [PATCH] kernel/sysctl_binary.c: improve the usage of return value'result'

[Chen Gang]

On 08/07/2013 02:42 PM, Li Zefan wrote:
> On 2013/8/7 14:10, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 13:56 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>>>>> The right answer to the code is to config it out and then you don't have
>>>>> to worry about it one way or another.
>> []
>>>> Hmm... do you mean you spend 5 minutes to get a conclusion ? if so,
>>>> better not use word 'seems' which is not a suitable word appeared in
>>>> the results, proofs or conclusions.
>> []
>>> You are too bad in english to do kernel development. You don't seem to
>>> know how to communicate in english...
>>
>> I don't think that's true.
>>
>> For instance, pessimization is a pretty
>> obscure word.  Most native English speakers
>> could probably guess what it meant, but I
>> couldn't hold any low opinion of non-native
>> speaker that asked "what does that mean".
>>
> 
> I know, and that's why I didn't quote that part.
> 

I guess, Joe also know about that.

He intends to explain 'pessimization' to me, so encourage me to continue
trying improving my English.


Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/