Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/jump-label: Show where and what was wrong onerrors

[Borislav Petkov]

On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 12:49:38PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> When modifying text sections for jump labels, a paranoid check is
> performed. If the check fails, the system "bugs". But why it failed
> is not shown.
> 
> The BUG_ON()s in the jump label update code is replaced with bug_at(ip).
> This is a function that will show what pointer failed, and what was
> at the location of the failure that made jump label panic.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c |   21 ++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c b/arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c
> index 24cf2b2..912a528 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,18 @@ union jump_code_union {
>  	} __attribute__((packed));
>  };
>  
> +static void bug_at(unsigned char *ip, int line)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * The location is not an op that we were expecting.
> +	 * Something went wrong. Crash the box, as something could be
> +	 * corrupting the kernel.
> +	 */
> +	pr_warning("Unexpected op at %pS [%p] (%02x %02x %02x %02x %02x) %s:%d\n",
> +	       ip, ip, ip[0], ip[1], ip[2], ip[3], ip[4], __FILE__, line);
> +	BUG();

Why not simply

	panic("Unexpected...")

?

Besides, BUG can be disabled in CONFIG_EXPERT.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/