Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ALSA: Added jack detection KControl support

From: Takashi Iwai
Date: Fri Aug 09 2013 - 12:50:13 EST


At Fri, 9 Aug 2013 17:39:47 +0100,
Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:52:04PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> > Above all, the multiple indices don't work anyway with the snd_jack
> > stuff in the current form. The index was introduced only for kjack,
> > and for HD-audio, snd_jack is provided just for a compatibility
> > reason, thus it doesn't matter much even if the multiple indices don't
> > work with it.
>
> > That being said, before going further, we need to consider how to
> > handle the input jack stuff with multiple indices.
>
> What's the big problem with indexes and input (hopefully also extcon...)
> reporting?

No big problem, but we haven't defined it.
Should the index be embedded in the name string or handled in a
different way?

> > > - snprintf(jack->name, sizeof(jack->name), "%s %s",
> > > + snprintf(jack->name, sizeof(jack->name), "%s %s Jack",
> > > card->shortname, jack->id);
>
> > This breaks the compatibility with the existing code.
> > You must not change the name of the existing input jack element.
> > Some drivers create "Headphone" and some do "Headphone Jack", yes.
> > It's bad, but too late to change.
>
> We can probably do something cheap like just check if there's a "Jack"
> already in the name?

Yes, I thought of it, too. But there are some funky names like
"hook_switch". Also, there is "Headphones", too.

So, IMO, the function should accept a special name for the input-jack
for compatibility reason while creating standard names for kjack, or
so...


Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/