Re: Reading perf counters at ftrace trace boundaries

[Karim Yaghmour]

On 13-08-11 10:47 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> That's what normal sampling already does.
> 
> If you're worried about systematic shadow effects just randomize a bit.

That's actually the point. I'd like to be able to study/compare both
approaches. I could be completely off, but I'd like to see if a divide
and conquer approach (i.e. based on ftrace) wouldn't take the guesswork
out of smart randomization. Just a hunch.

-- 
Karim Yaghmour
CEO - Opersys inc. / www.opersys.com
http://twitter.com/karimyaghmour

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/