Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] mm: make lru_add_drain_all() selective

[Tejun Heo]

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:44:55PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> int lru_add_drain_all(void)
> {
>         static struct cpumask mask;

Instead of cpumask,

>         static DEFINE_MUTEX(lock);

you can DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct work_struct, ...).

>         for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>                 if (pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_add_pvec, cpu)) ||
>                     pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_rotate_pvecs, cpu)) ||
>                     pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_deactivate_pvecs, cpu)) ||
>                     need_activate_page_drain(cpu))
>                         cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &mask);

and schedule the work items directly.

>         }
> 
>         rc = schedule_on_cpu_mask(lru_add_drain_per_cpu, &mask);

Open coding flushing can be a bit bothersome but you can create a
per-cpu workqueue and schedule work items on it and then flush the
workqueue instead too.

No matter how flushing is implemented, the path wouldn't have any
memory allocation, which I thought was the topic of the thread, no?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/