Re: [PATCH 0/3] module: Allow parameters without arguments

[Lucas De Marchi]

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Lucas De Marchi
<lucas.de.marchi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 20:34:58 -0300
>> Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> so in kcmdline we would have modulename.param instead of modulename.param=1?
>>>
>>> I guess we need to update kmod then, because currently we ignore and
>>> treat this case as a wrong token. From a quick look, allowing it in
>>> kmod would be as simple as removing a condition check.
>>>
>>> Lucas De Marchi
>>
>> Note, both will still work. And it didn't change much. Today, anything
>> that uses "module_param()" with bool type (a quick git grep shows 570
>> users), already do not require a value.
>>
>> Randomly looking at one... drivers/input/mouse/synaptics_i2c.c, you can
>> just do:
>>
>>  insmod synaptics_i2c.ko no_filter
>>
>> no need to add a "=1" to that.
>>
>> But anything else will still require a value. I just want to allow
>> other parameters that act like a boolean to not require one.
>
> true... but currently "modprobe synaptics_i2c" doesn't get the
> parameter correctly from kernel command line if it doesn't have a
> value. And I agree this not something that changed but rather a bug in
> kmod waiting to be fixed.

And it's fixed now with a proper test added.

thanks

Lucas De Marchi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/