Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf, x86: use INTEL_UEVENT_EXTRA_REG to define MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_X

From: Yan, Zheng
Date: Sun Aug 18 2013 - 21:26:42 EST


ping

On 07/18/2013 05:02 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Silvermont (22nm Atom) has two offcore response configuration MSRs,
> unlike other Intel CPU, its event code for MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_1 is 0x02b7.
> To avoid complicating intel_fixup_er(), use INTEL_UEVENT_EXTRA_REG to
> define MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_X. So intel_fixup_er() can find the event code
> for OFFCORE_RSP_N by x86_pmu.extra_regs[N].event.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> index fbc9210..d312edf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> @@ -81,7 +81,8 @@ static struct event_constraint intel_nehalem_event_constraints[] __read_mostly =
>
> static struct extra_reg intel_nehalem_extra_regs[] __read_mostly =
> {
> - INTEL_EVENT_EXTRA_REG(0xb7, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0, 0xffff, RSP_0),
> + /* must define OFFCORE_RSP_X first, see intel_fixup_er() */
> + INTEL_UEVENT_EXTRA_REG(0x01b7, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0, 0xffff, RSP_0),
> INTEL_UEVENT_PEBS_LDLAT_EXTRA_REG(0x100b),
> EVENT_EXTRA_END
> };
> @@ -143,8 +144,9 @@ static struct event_constraint intel_ivb_event_constraints[] __read_mostly =
>
> static struct extra_reg intel_westmere_extra_regs[] __read_mostly =
> {
> - INTEL_EVENT_EXTRA_REG(0xb7, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0, 0xffff, RSP_0),
> - INTEL_EVENT_EXTRA_REG(0xbb, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_1, 0xffff, RSP_1),
> + /* must define OFFCORE_RSP_X first, see intel_fixup_er() */
> + INTEL_UEVENT_EXTRA_REG(0x01b7, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0, 0xffff, RSP_0),
> + INTEL_UEVENT_EXTRA_REG(0x01bb, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_1, 0xffff, RSP_1),
> INTEL_UEVENT_PEBS_LDLAT_EXTRA_REG(0x100b),
> EVENT_EXTRA_END
> };
> @@ -163,15 +165,17 @@ static struct event_constraint intel_gen_event_constraints[] __read_mostly =
> };
>
> static struct extra_reg intel_snb_extra_regs[] __read_mostly = {
> - INTEL_EVENT_EXTRA_REG(0xb7, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0, 0x3f807f8fffull, RSP_0),
> - INTEL_EVENT_EXTRA_REG(0xbb, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_1, 0x3f807f8fffull, RSP_1),
> + /* must define OFFCORE_RSP_X first, see intel_fixup_er() */
> + INTEL_UEVENT_EXTRA_REG(0x01b7, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0, 0x3f807f8fffull, RSP_0),
> + INTEL_UEVENT_EXTRA_REG(0x01bb, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_1, 0x3f807f8fffull, RSP_1),
> INTEL_UEVENT_PEBS_LDLAT_EXTRA_REG(0x01cd),
> EVENT_EXTRA_END
> };
>
> static struct extra_reg intel_snbep_extra_regs[] __read_mostly = {
> - INTEL_EVENT_EXTRA_REG(0xb7, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0, 0x3fffff8fffull, RSP_0),
> - INTEL_EVENT_EXTRA_REG(0xbb, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_1, 0x3fffff8fffull, RSP_1),
> + /* must define OFFCORE_RSP_X first, see intel_fixup_er() */
> + INTEL_UEVENT_EXTRA_REG(0x01b7, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0, 0x3fffff8fffull, RSP_0),
> + INTEL_UEVENT_EXTRA_REG(0x01bb, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_1, 0x3fffff8fffull, RSP_1),
> INTEL_UEVENT_PEBS_LDLAT_EXTRA_REG(0x01cd),
> EVENT_EXTRA_END
> };
> @@ -1301,11 +1305,11 @@ static void intel_fixup_er(struct perf_event *event, int idx)
>
> if (idx == EXTRA_REG_RSP_0) {
> event->hw.config &= ~INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK;
> - event->hw.config |= 0x01b7;
> + event->hw.config |= x86_pmu.extra_regs[EXTRA_REG_RSP_0].event;
> event->hw.extra_reg.reg = MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0;
> } else if (idx == EXTRA_REG_RSP_1) {
> event->hw.config &= ~INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK;
> - event->hw.config |= 0x01bb;
> + event->hw.config |= x86_pmu.extra_regs[EXTRA_REG_RSP_1].event;
> event->hw.extra_reg.reg = MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_1;
> }
> }
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/