Re: [PATCH] Fix stack corruption on some architectures

[Sergei Shtylyov]

Hello.

On 08/20/2013 12:37 AM, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:

> There is no need to get an interface specification if we know it's the
> wrong one; trivial change.

   Is it related to stack corruption? If not, it's asking to be in a separate 
patch.

> The big thing, though, was explained in the
> #mipslinux IRC channel:
> [Mon 2013-08-19 12:28:21 PM PDT] <headless> guys, are you sure it's not "DMA off stack" case?
> [Mon 2013-08-19 12:28:35 PM PDT] <headless> it's a known stack corruptor on non-coherent arches
> [Mon 2013-08-19 12:31:48 PM PDT] <DonkeyHotei> headless: for usb/ehci?
> [Mon 2013-08-19 12:34:11 PM PDT] <DonkeyHotei> headless: explain
> [Mon 2013-08-19 12:35:38 PM PDT] <headless> usb_control_msg() (or other such func) should not use buffer on stack. DMA from/to stack is prohibited
> [Mon 2013-08-19 12:35:58 PM PDT] <headless> and EHCI uses DMA on control xfers (as well as all the others)

   That headless was me. :-)

> Signed-off-by: Daniel Gimpelevich <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/