Re: [PATCH] i2c-omap: always send stop after nack

[Grygorii Strashko]

On 08/19/2013 03:11 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > Which means your original patch starts to make a lot more sense. I
> > > wonder is this is really what we should be doing though - breaking out
> > > of the loop, I mean.
>
> Yup, that is fine. I applied the old patch with Acks from Hein and
> Felipe to -next. Thanks!

Thanks.

> > It looks like TI's i2c-davinci will have the same problem as i2c-omap,
> > and will need the same change.
>
> Somebody up for this?

Regards,
-grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/