Re: Proposed stable release changes

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:58:15AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 03:40:32PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Given that I had to just revert a patch in the recent stable releases
> > that didn't get enough time to "bake" in Linus's tree (or in -next), I
> > figured it was worth discussing some possible changes with how "fast" I
> > pick up patches for stable releases.
> > 
> > So, how about this proposal:
> > 
> > - I will wait for a -rc to come out with the patch in it before putting
> >   it into a stable release, unless:
> > 	- the maintainer ACKs it, or sends it directly (like DaveM does
> > 	  for networking patches)
> > 	- I have seen enough discussion about a patch to show that it
> > 	  really does fix something / is good / doesn't cause problems.
> > 	- obviously safe, i.e. "add a device id" type thing.
> > 
> > Given that we have -rc releases every week, except for the initial -rc1
> > release, I don't think this will really cause any major delays.
> 
> In the last discussion you initiated on the subject, I proposed something
> even more conservative which was the same as above except instead of
> "wait for a -rc", it was "wait for rc1 after a full release containing
> the patch", unless one of the conditions you proposed, or another one
> which would be a tag "urgent" or something like this in the patch.

Waiting 3 months is too long, in my opinion, sorry.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/