Re: [PATCH] kernel/padata.c: always check the return value of __padata_remove_cpu()and __padata_add_cpu()

[Chen Gang]

On 08/22/2013 01:11 PM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:44:31AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>
>> If this patch is correct, better to let CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED
>> share the same code.
>>
>> And do we need a comment "/* fall through */" between CPU_UP_CANCELED
>> and CPU_DOWN_FAILED (or it is another bug, need a 'break' statement) ?
>>
>> At last, also better to let CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED share
>> the same code (if need a 'break'), or share the most of code (if "fall
>> through").
>>
> 
> CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED can share the code. Same is true for
> CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 

Thank you too.

And need I send another patch for it ?

Or just make by yourself (and better to mark me as Reported-by). :-)


Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/