Re: [PATCH] idr: Use this_cpu_ptr() for percpu_ida

[Jens Axboe]

On 08/22/2013 10:44 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Aug 2013, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
>> The lock is needed so that one cpu can steal tags from another cpu's cache.
>> See (the needlessly inlined!) steal_tags().
> 
> Stealing tags could also be done via IPIs or some other things.

That is actually the approach I took for blk-mq tagging. But that isn't
free either. I think it pretty much boils down to how much stealing you
expect. If the tag space is sufficiently large, you would not expect a
lot of stealing. And then it doesn't really matter if you use a lock or
an IPI, since it's the rare case - the lock cacheline isn't going to be
shared across processors anyway. The ticket locks aren't exactly free on
their own, however, so that cost is still paid. But I'd be surprised if
it was much of an issue.

If the tag space isn't large enough (common case), then yes, it matters
a lot what kind of mechanism is used. It's on my TODO to compare the two
under realistic scenarios and see how they fare.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/