Re: [RFC PATCH v3] sched: Limit idle balance based on max cost persched domain

[Jason Low]

On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 13:10 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Fully agreed, this is something we should do regardless -- for as long
> as we preserve the avg_idle() machinery anyway :-)

Okay, I'll have the avg_idle fix as part 1 of the v4 patchset.

> The thing you 'forgot' to mention is if this patch actually helps you
> workload?

Yes, this helps a lot of the workloads on the 8 socket machines. I will
be sure to include some numbers next time.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/