Re: [PATCH 2/6] vhost_net: use vhost_add_used_and_signal_n() in vhost_zerocopy_signal_used()

[Jason Wang]

On 08/20/2013 10:33 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 08/16/2013 05:54 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 01:16:26PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>> Switch to use vhost_add_used_and_signal_n() to avoid multiple calls to
>>>> vhost_add_used_and_signal(). With the patch we will call at most 2 times
>>>> (consider done_idx warp around) compared to N times w/o this patch.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> So? Does this help performance then?
>>
> Looks like it can especially when guest does support event index. When
> guest enable tx interrupt, this can saves us some unnecessary signal to
> guest. I will do some test.

Have done some test. I can see 2% - 3% increasing in both aggregate
transaction rate and per cpu transaction rate in TCP_RR and UDP_RR test.

I'm using ixgbe. W/o this patch, I can see more than 100 calls of
vhost_add_used_signal() in one vhost_zerocopy_signaled_used(). This is
because ixgbe (and other modern ethernet driver) tends to free old tx
skbs in a loop during tx interrupt, and vhost tend to batch the adding
used and signal in vhost_zerocopy_callback(). Switching to use
vhost_add_use_and_signal_n() means saving 100 times of used idx updating
and memory barriers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/