Re: /proc/pid/fd && anon_inode_fops

[Linus Torvalds]

On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> We are really stuck with the current semantics here - switching to
> *BSD one would not only mean serious surgery on descriptor handling
> (it's one of the wartier areas in *BSD VFS, in large part because
> of magic-open-really-a-dup kludges they have to do), it would change
> a long-standing userland API that had been there for nearly 20 years
> _and_ one that tends to be used in corner cases of hell knows how many
> scripts.

Actually, I'm pretty sure we did have the "dup" semantics at one point
(long ago), and they were really nice (because you could use them to
see where in the stream the fd was etc). It just fit so horribly badly
into the VFS semantics that it got changed into the current "new file
descriptor" one. Afaik, nothing broke.

So I'm not really sure about the "we're stuck with it" for semantic
reasons, and it turns out that very few programs/scripts actually use
/proc/<pid>/fd/<nr> at all (random use of /dev/stdin is likely the
most common case). But I agree about the "serious surgery on
descriptor handling" part.

              Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/